Phased Array of Dipole-on-Ground Antennas for HF Reception

Matt Roberts - matt-at-kk5jy-dot-net

Published: 2016-04-29

Updated: 2017-12-29


Close-spaced phased arrays exhibit useful directivity characteristics for reception of skywave signals.  The dipole antenna is a natural and simple element type for a phased array antenna, and the placement of untuned (nonresonant) horizontal antenna elements very close to the ground provides a pattern that is a useful building block for constructing such arrays.  Combining the concepts developed in the loop-on-ground with those from the small loop array, and substituting a nonresonant dipole for each array element, another type of space-efficient phased array can be realized.  This array has a far-field pattern that is very similar to that of the array of small vertical loop antennas, combined with the space-efficiency and stealth of the Loop-on-Ground.

The loop-on-ground is not the only form factor for a ground-mounted horizontal antenna.  A simple dipole has a nearly identical pattern when mounted on the surface (is a dipole-on-ground a DoG?), and realizes a different kind of space efficiency.  The dipole-on-ground yields a similar electrical efficiency (peak gain) as a square loop when each leg of the dipole has the same length as each side of the loop.  This means that the dipole's space distribution trades length for width.  That is, a dipole is a thin line across the ground, but it is twice as long as any side of a square loop, and offers similar electrical performance.  Figure 1 shows an EZNEC model and three-dimensional pattern of a single dipole-on-ground element.

Single Element  Single Element Pattern
Figure 1: EZ-NEC Antenna Model and 3D Pattern
Single Element


The main lobes of the dipole are off the ends of the wire, particularly at low elevation angles.  The pattern is very similar to the LoG antenna pattern, or that of an electrically small vertical loop mounted substantially less than λ / 4 above the ground.  Like any of those antennas, the pattern is vertically polarized.  Note that the dipole-on-ground is not a "low dipole", such as is used for an NVIS transmitting antenna, or otherwise mounted a few feet above ground.  This antenna element is deliberately mounted on the surface, which completely cancels the horizontal response of the antenna pattern, and allows it to respond to low-angle signals used for long-distance communications.

The remainder of this article describes a phased array of ground-mounted dipole antennas, very similar to the phased array of vertical loop antennas.  In fact, most of the material in that article with respect to feedlines and phasing is also applicable with DoG elements, so it will not be repeated here.

In order to use the dipole-on-ground in a phased array to obtain a unidirectional azimuth pattern, the elements are positioned end-to-end, in a straight line.  Figure 2 is an EZ-NEC model of a two-element endfire dipole-on-ground.  The elements are each 180 inches long (15ft), with 60 inches (5ft) of separation between the elements at their closest point.  The overall length of the antenna is 35'.

Endfire Array
Figure 2: EZ-NEC Antenna Model
End-fire Array


As with the vertical loop array, the dipole array requires preamplifiers to isolate the antenna from the delay lines.  Otherwise, the asymmetric reflections within the delay lines will spoil the front/back ratio of the pattern.  Alternatively, the individual elements can be loaded with resistance to match them to the feedlines, but doing so decreases the element gain significantly, which causes even more preamplifier gain to be needed.  So the simplest solution is to use equal feedline lengths between the untuned, unloaded elements and the preamplifiers, and then place the delay lines between the preamplifiers and the combiner.

When properly phased, the array can produce a pattern similar to the array of small vertical loops:

40m Elevation Plane
Figure 3: 40m Elevation Plane

80m Elevation Plane
Figure 4: 80m Elevation Plane

160m Elevation Plane
Figure 5: 160m Elevation Plane

The azimuth profile of this antnena is essentially the same as with the vertical loop array.  Azimuth plots are shown here for 80m response, at the elevation of peak response (~27°) and at 10° elevation.

80m Elevation Plane
Figure 6: 80m Azimuth Plane, 27° Elevation

80m Elevation Plane
Figure 7: 80m Azimuth Plane, 10° Elevation

The shape of the azimuth pattern is similar down practically to the horizon.  This is the predicted azimuth at 5°:

80m Elevation Plane
Figure 8: 80m Azimuth Plane, 5° Elevation

The delay lines used in the model for 40m and 80m are 133° and 156°, respectively.  As with the vertical loop array, the required delay is dependent upon the size of the elements, and the spacing between them.

The main feature distinguishing this design from the vertical loop array is its physical profile.  The long, thin profile of this antenna makes it ideal for installation almost anywhere.  The centerline of the antenna "points" in the direction of the main lobe, and the antenna direction can be electrically reversed by swapping the delay lines on the receiver side of the preamplifiers.  This makes aiming the antenna much easier than an array built from the loop-on-ground elements.  Otherwise, this antenna behaves similarly to the vertical loop array.

In fact, it should be trivial to construct an array like this with a spacing rope between the two elements to ensure a predictable gap between them as the array is moved.  This rope and the two elements could be tied together so that they are one continuous line, which would make installation or relocation trivially easy.  A temporary or portable version could be held to the ground by just two tent stakes, one at each end of such an assembly, and the spacing would be guaranteed as long as the array was pulled tight before staking it to the ground.  This is a significant improvement over the LoG, which requires some care during layout, to maintain loop symmetry.

The calculated RDF for 40m and 80m is also similar to the vertical loop array, with values of 8.9dB and 9.2dB, respectively.  This places it on par with a well-designed and constructed Beverage antenna that is several hundred feet long, yet this model fits in a space that is only 35' long.


Copyright (C) 2016,2017 by Matt Roberts, All Rights Reserved.